Compare and contrast traditional approach and contemporary approach to management

Autocratic style of leaders keeps all decision making and all other authorities to themselves and followers just do only what they were asked to do while democratic style of leaders encourage group participation and majority rule. Finally, it will analyse the contribution of emergent models of leadership and justify how those emergent models of leadership have enhanced the contemporary leader in a world of rapidly changing technology.

A second conclusion was that the workplace could be equated to a social system consisting of informal groups which bear great influence over the attitude and behavior of the employees.

Abstract Public health policies must address multiple goals and complex community health needs. The management literature has distinguished two main uses of management control practices: Under TQM, management provides for continuous improvement and innovation in processes and systems, products and services.

This is just an expansion to what Fayol had put in place A study has been carried out by Mintzberg on five chief executives of medium sized to large organisations. The main difference between traditional models and modern leadership models would be all traditional models of leadership emphasise characteristics or behaviours of only one leader within a particular group where as emergent models provide a space to have more than one leader at the same time.

Some of these approaches bear their roots in the s and the s and continue to be dominant in the management circles to date Wren, Additional personnel have to make sure the working level employees have the required data and know about the decisions being made by other teams.

The coercive use of MCP refers to a typical top-down and central control, which focused on comparing planned goals with realized goals, and taking corrective actions for any variance.

Human Resource Management Traditional Approach: Processes and Controls

A particular product or service required to meet at least one of these dimensions for being considered to be of high -quality by the customer. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Many layers of authority are favoured by traditional management with short span of control.

What is the difference between traditional and contemporary leadership?

Budget is the traditional practice most used in health public organizations for planning, evaluating and controlling the achievement of objectives and goals.

In addition, another very important and interesting approach of leadership is leaderful organisation. Charismatic, transformational and transactional leadership models are the main contemporary models of leadership and those models argues that the effective leaders are the people who can manage followers and take effective decisions in complex, challenging and changing situations.

A contemporary structure that has shifted decisions to the working level ensures that the employees most familiar with the work make the corresponding decisions. If you were to have a very weak leader then they would not have the authority to get Simon Fuller s 1 anything done.

Oxford University Press Hersey. Baltic Journal of Management5 3pp.

Comparisons between TQM and Traditional Approach

Processes are the actions through which practitioners seek to identify and address community health problems. This theory came up with two factors namely the motivating factors and the hygiene factors.

The approach to strategic management in most organization also focuses on the efficiency and effectiveness of logistics involved in the production process Raduan, et al, Management of Organizational Behavior.

Organizational behavior in health care. Maslow came up with a theory that categorized the needs that employees needed to satisfy in a hierarchy Maslow, TQM, on the other hand, aims at to create a culture of networking across and among functions linked through a network of collaborating internal and external suppliers and customers.

The reconciliation between the management and the workforce leads to the industrial relations component, a major activity in traditional resource management. With the realization that human resources can potentially be a source of competitive advantage for organizations, considerable emphasis has been placed in developing a highly competent and motivated workforce that understands their role in delivering the strategic objectives of the organizations Raduan, et al, Educational Leadership49 5pp.Abstract: This study inspects the contemporary theories of management contextually quantitative approach, system approach and contingency approach since the comparison mode of the study.

Contemporary Approaches and the Environments of a Business Contemporary Approaches and the Environments of a Business Andre Scarlett The contemporary approach is the most modern approach to management; it has improved on and even integrated the key concepts created by the classical approach to management.

Traditional and contemporary organizational structures are distinguished by the level of control afforded to front-line employees.

Contemporary structures are more flexible and responsive to changing business environments, while traditional structures may be more efficient in a stable enviroment. Traditional management views management as a commodity and are passive contributors with little autonomy, whereas in TQM practice, people are active contributors and are recognised for their creativity and intelligence.

In traditional management, quality is the adherence o internal specifications. 2 Management summary Management literature exhibits trends over time, and a shift seems to occur from attention for Traditional towards more Modern management approaches.

Traditional method relies mainly on textbooks while the modern method relies on hands-on materials approach. In traditional method, presentation of materials starts with the parts, then moves on to the whole while in the modern approach, presentation of materials starts with the whole, then moves to the parts.

Download
Compare and contrast traditional approach and contemporary approach to management
Rated 4/5 based on 73 review