They seek to explain the cause-effect relationship between variables. Exposure to sexually explicit content in early adolescence will predict less progressive gender role attitudes and more permissive sexual norms in later adolescence.
The study initially assumed that the subsequent sexual attitudes and behaviors of the adolescents are determined or caused by something.
In other words, what is considered to be offensive in one community, may be not offensive in the other one. Eds The Handbook of Communication Science 2nd ed. Demonstrating causality is a complicated business. This paper critiques the regulation of current obscenity laws and touches upon the issues which are closely connected with sexual explicit communication.
However, it cannot be related Sexually explicit communication paper the sexually explicit communication which is considered to be offensive for some people.
This is one of the theories under the more general socialization theory, one of the mainstream media effects theories. Adherence to the Positivist Orientation The authors, true to being social scientists, employed the scientific method in their research, thus adhering to the positivist orientation of communication theory.
This theory illustrates the nomothetic type of explanation, in contrast to an idiographic explanation. This is due to the assertion that individual communities do not have the legal mandate to create laws regulating obscene or erotic materials. The behaviour is reinforced, with positive outcomes, leading a person to repeat the behaviour.
In sum, in order to claim that one variable causes another, the researchers designed a methodology, specifically a two-phase survey using Audio- Computer Assisted Self Interview to demonstrate that 1 the exposure to sexually explicit media precedes the effects in time, 2 there is an observed empirical relationship between them, and 3 the relationship is not found to be the result of some third variable.
This is a debatable question. Therefore, the definition of community standards should be given a broader view to encompass national community values and expectations as the basis of conducting the Miller test.
Large amounts of sexually explicit information can damage our society. Exposure to sexually explicit media as an early adolescent will predict greater likelihood of having had oral sex and earlier transition to sexual intercourse in later adolescence, for males and females. The main cause, the exposure to sexually explicit content in early adolescence has several effects in later adolescence on the following: That is why many critics of the Miller Test consider that the community standards are not an appropriate way to determine obscenity.
It seems that there is something about the level of exposure to sexually explicit media that can predict the sexual attitudes and behaviors in later adolescence, or at least this is the pattern present initially in the study.
The following are apparent from the paper: Communication research has difficulties in regard to this apparently obvious requirement. In other words, what is considered to be offensive in one community, may be not offensive in the other one. After the statistical analyses of data, the study accepted the following hypotheses: It can be related to some expression or speech which is not protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and is illegal and prohibited.
These characteristics are known as variables. Rabin, and Robert A. A hypothesis is not a final answer but rather a proposal to be tested and evaluated.
Most of the time, the level of exposure to sexually explicit media is related to the sexual attitudes and behaviors in later adolescence, but not always.
At least, in the probabilistic world of explanations, there are a few perfect relationships. When variables are related, we have the ability to predict one variable with knowledge of the other variable. The study concluded that by the end of middle school, many teens have seen sexually explicit content not only on the Internet but in more traditional forms of media as well.
Hire Writer Nevertheless, governments and state supreme courts have the authority to specify materials to be categorized as offensive. In its definition, the law prohibits even electronic generated obscene materials involving children. This contention is mainly driven by lack of consensus on the legal, cultural, and academic definitions of obscenity.
In fact, when they can study attitudes and behaviors meaningfully without involving actual persons, social scientists do.Sexually Explicit Communication Sexually explicit communication is another quandary for the American judicial system, because there must be a balance between protecting a citizen’s right to expression and a citizen’s right to not be subjugated to offending material.
In this paper, patterns of sexually explicit media use among a demographically diverse panel of early adolescents in the United States are described and relationships. In this paper, we will review the direction of current obscenity laws and touches upon the issues which are firmly associated with sexually explicit communication.
This additionally talks about government direction which ought to control sexual obscenity properly%(6). • Prepare a 1, to 1,word paper on either sexually explicit communication or fair trial.
o Sexually Explicit Communication Paper Critique the regulation of current obscenity laws. Use both. Buy, download and read COM Week 5 Individual Assignment Explicit Communication or Fair T COM Week 5 Individual Assignment Explicit Comm on your iPad, iPhone, Android, Tablets, Kindle Fire, Windows 8, Web, Mac and PCs only from Joomag - The Digital Newsstand.
“obscenity,” in this paper we’ll use the term “sexually explicit media” as a more neu- tral term and as a way of distinguishing more visually explicit sexual content from most mainstream sexual content that does not include depictions of genitals or gen.Download